Apologising to the Ashtanga Community
Yep – I messed up.
My recent article Why I may never take another yoga class was intended to articulate a view that it doesn’t matter what kind of yoga we practice, only that it is the right kind of yoga for us.
Instead, because I was unclear, and less than skillful in my use of metaphors, many people have felt that I was dissing Ashtanga as a practice.
In the article, I used my recent experiences in yoga classes to demonstrate that doing a particular practice when it’s no longer right for us and being able to listen to that is what does matter.
In doing so, I named one of the styles I’d been doing – Ashtanga. I named it because I wanted to explore a further point that made me curious about that particular practice.
I was curious to know:
How come Krishnamacharya was so big on people doing a practice tailored specifically for their own needs, yet one of his most famous students, Sri K. Pattabhi Jois, has taught a set sequence to thousands and thousands of people?
I didn’t articulate my curiousity well, and it came across as a condemnation. Plus because it was getting mixed into the other aspect of my article, which was explaining why I’m unlikely to go to a general, led yoga class again, it sounded like I was saying Ashtanga was wrong.
Not only that, but my mixed-up-metophor of still ponds, and lap pools, and frolicing under waterfalls totally mis-represented Ashtanga, and my intentions.
Y’ai, y’ai, y’ai!
I am so sorry.
I’m sorry that that I misrepresented Ashtanga Yoga.
I’m sorry that it sounded like I was dissing it as a practice.
I’m sorry that my writing was unclear and unskilled.
What I’m not sorry about is the discussion that it has generated as a result.
It’s ironic that an article written to suggest that… we in the yoga community need to stop talking about which style is right or wrong or better or worse and simply accept that no matter how it is practiced, yoga is offering someone something… that yoga is always a journey and sure we may start out at a gym where there’s no mention of the mystical, but it doesn’t matter because as students we’ll always find where we need to be… such an article ended up perpetrating the very thing it was trying to dissolve.
Doh!
But that’s ok, because it gives us an opportunity to model a way to have compassionate, insightful, dialogue that brings about further cohesion.
And I feel that’s exactly what’s happened with first Nick Potter’s insightful comment on my original article, which you can now read as an article here, and also Catherine Albiston’s thoughtful comment.
Reading through their comments made me realise that, doh! I hadn’t been clear. What they’d read was something very different from what I thought I’d written. So I went back and re-read my article, and I saw how my lack of skill in using metaphors, and my lack of clarity had done me a huge disservice, and by extension, it had done the yoga community a huge disservice.
So I’m apologising for my lack of clarity, and I’m also going to take an opportunity to express – as clearly and succinctly as I can – the points I was attempting to make in my original article.
- What is yoga? It is that which leads us toward the cessation of the fluctuations of the mind. It is that which leads us into stillness.
- For each of us, the practice which suits our temperament and personality in providing the balance required to still the mind will all be different.
- There is a danger of getting stuck in just asana, or in a particular style or class or teacher because it’s comfortable in that place.
- For some of us, a particular style, or class, or teacher will be right where we are meant to be.
- For others of us, we need to pay attention to why we attracted to a particular style, class, or teacher and make sure it isn’t merely feeding our ego but balancing it.
- My own practice has evolved into daily meditation, pranayama, and mantra.
- Asana is a less and less important part of this mix.
- When I do practice asana, it is prana/Shakti/Kundalini led. It is now a Dance of the Divine.
- For me, going to a led-class no longer suits because the call of Shakti within is so strong that I experience a conflict between the teacher’s instruction and Shakti.
- This conflict has happened in all three classes I’ve attended in the last few months, including Bikram, Anusara & Ashtanga.
- It hasn’t occurred in the classes I’ve done with Shiva Rea, because she teaches in such a way that allows students to express sahaja (spontaneous prana-led asana)
- While my practice is Shakti-led, observations from teachers on held energy or points of alignment are still illuminating, suggesting I still have need of a teacher.
- My practice has spilled off my mat and is often expressed in the day-to-day goings on of my life, when I feel the dance of the divine within.
My intention in writing this article, was to explore this other way that we practice yoga – a way outside of set sequences, and classes. And in addition to the feedback from the Ashtanga community, I received feedback from people saying something along these lines:
Ooohhh, lovely, resonates with me completely!
Because these people aren’t Ashtanga practitioners, they didn’t notice my lack of clarity and instead resonated with the other aspect of my article -that yoga is eventually a breath-led, shakti-fied, spontaneous-arising from within.
And for some of us, that will look like Ashtanga – as Nick says:
Once I learn a sequence, I do not need to think about what is coming next or what I think I might want to do. My mind becomes more still as I just flow from one posture to the next. Outer structure leads to inner freedom.
Yet for others, that yoga will look completely different.
What is the same, what makes it Yoga, is not the outer form our bodies take during the practice, but the internal experience of the practitioner.
Bit hard to see that from the outside though, unless you can see energy, which many of us can now…
So thank you to the Ashtanga community, especially those who took the time to craft comments on my article. Together, with compassion and understanding, I feel like we’ve explored something that’s really important to the yoga community – a way to acknowledge the many outer forms of the practice while honouring the sameness of the inner experience.
In other words, it’s all yoga when it’s yoga.
Namaste all,
KL
Well, that cleared that up 😉
When we gonna get some 1st hand attempts at describing some of those shakti moments? What would do those moments reasonable justice?
Will it take a return to metaphor? Mixed or not?
U got a lot bubbling up 😉
Oh Adan…
I’ve been toying with doing some videos of Shakti’fied practice. She’s a tricky thing though, because the act of putting on the camera adds a layer of self-consciousness that needs to be dissolved in order for Shakti to arise.
But I’m workin’ on it… stay tuned.
Blessings,
KL
I salute you for apologising, although I don’t feel it is necessary. I do not practice ashtanga precisely for the reasons stated, and even more actually. Rigidity and injuries (knees, hips, etc) are not something I aim for in my practice – it’s sthira sukham asanam all the way, comfortable and steady. In fact I find it appaling that there are some teachers who joke about being able to sit in lotus with both hips replaced as a result of a rigid practice. No thank you. Just my two cents worth, that’s all.
Hey Monica,
Wow – you know some interesting teachers. Two hip replacements?
My intention on this site is clarity, truth and cohesion, amongst other things, and upon reflection, I just reckon that original article of mine fell a little flat on those things.
Which is all ok… because it’s nice to see open and interested dialogue as a result.
Many blessings,
KL
I find it interesting to hear the word “rigidity” and “injury” in association with Ashtanga yoga. Any Ashtanga teacher I have practiced with (Mike B, Peter Sanson, Kiri) uses words like “gently”, “softly”, “with the breath”, “no discomfort”………….
i think “if” there’s a bottomline to the question of injuries and rigidity in any style of yoga, it’s that the same is true for any human endeavor, any fitness routine, any profession –
the range of human beings is as broad as the number of people on our earth, from rigid or uncaring or cruel or mad to trying to get by or puzzled or confused to learning or trying or conscientious to truly helpful and knowledgeable and honest –
and who knows how many other adjectives could also fairly be applied…
it’s maybe the hardest challenge, for those of us who want to do our part, to the part we can, as well as we can, and definitely for me, to remember, it is a process…
the quote kara-leah used in her recent immersion post is my current bff 😉 “there is always that memory in your cells of what Truth is”
located at: http://theyogalunchbox.co.nz/2011/02/15/wherein-our-heroine-gets-to-spend-the-afternoon-with-yoda/
Hey Adan,
With you on this one – it’s not Ashtanga that is rigid, or causes injuries, but our approach to it.
It may be more likely that someone will exacerbate their rigid tendencies, or body-denying tendencies which lead to injury, in a practice like Astanga as opposed to say Yin.
Blessings,
KL